Drawing for BE*TWEEN

USPTO serial 76402129

BE*TWEEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BE*TWEEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lauren J. Mandell

LAWRENCE APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009musical sound recordings; musical video recordings; downloadable musical sound recordings; prerecorded video tapes on a wide variety of subjects; motion picture films on a wide variety of subjectsACTIVE
016series of children's books; merchandise, namely, postcards, stickers, posters, gift-wrapping, note pads, note cards, stationery, photo albums, address books, calendars, personal planners, book covers, book ends, book marks, loose leaf binders, blank cards, gift cards, greeting cardsACTIVE
025clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, and headwear; merchandise, namely head bands and scarvesACTIVE
041entertainment services, namely live performances by a musical group; Internet based services, namely, producing and providing a website that features information in the fields of education and entertainment; entertainment in the nature of ongoing television programs for childrenACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 14, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 14, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 17, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 16, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 24, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 15, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jul 14, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 11, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 26, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance