USPTO serial 76402799
OENOBIOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OENOBIOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard C. Miskin, Esq.
HOWARD C MISKIN STOLL, MISKIN & BADIE350 FIFTH AVE STE 4710NEW YORK, NY 10118UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; preparations to the skin, eyes, or hair for cosmetic purposes, namely, skin lotions, hair lotions, skin conditioners, hair conditioners, hair spray, eyeliners, skin gels and skin lotions for accelerating tans, wrinkle-reducing skin care preparations, and skin creams and topical gels for reducing water and lipids in the limbs | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Nutritional supplements for cosmetic, medical and therapeutic purposes; nutritional supplements incorporating proteins, glucids, lipids and fibers for cosmetic, medical and therapeutic purposes; nutritional supplements incorporating micronutrients, vitamins, minerals, amino acids, fatty acids and vegetal acids for cosmetics, medical and therapeutic purposes; dietetic products, namely, diuretic preparations in liquid and capsule form; health food supplements; dietary supplements for non-medical use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Laboratoire Oenobiol, SA
- Other trademarks owned by Laboratoire Oenobiol, SA
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named OENOBIOL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |