USPTO serial 76404746
PURE FIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2824459Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2004
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURE FIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pure Comfort Technologies, LLC
Dedham, MA
Pure Comfort Technologies, LLC
Dedham, MA
STATESVILLE, NC
Norfolk, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Sullivan
John L. Sullivan ALSTON & BIRD LLP101 SOUTH TRYON STE, STE 4000CHARLOTTE, NC 28280-4000UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | User-customizable footwear and insoles for footwear | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pure Comfort Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Pure Comfort Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by THRONEBURG, JAMES L.
- Other trademarks owned by Pure Athletic, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named PURE FIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2010 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| May 10, 2010 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 10, 2010 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | PINT | REPRINTING REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |