USPTO serial 76405918
MISHKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2985759Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 16, 2005
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MISHKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bayonne, NJ
Bayonne, NJ
Bayonne, NJ
BROOKLYN, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura J. Winston, Andrew Baum, Paul Fields, Robert S. Weisbein, Amy J. Benjamin, Eric Prager, Karin Segall, Randi S. Miller, Heather C. Wilde, Jonathan Matkowsky, Abigail Rubinstein and Kathryn Starnella
LAURA J WINSTON, ANDREW BAUM, PAUL FIEL DARBY & DARBY PCPO BOX 5257NEW YORK, NY 10150-5257UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Vodka | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROYAL WINE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ROYAL WINE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ROYAL WINE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by MYSTIQUE BRANDS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named MISHKA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 2, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 25, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |