USPTO serial 76407111
MRS. MUDD'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2939072Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 12, 2005
- Examiner
- DEJESUS, YSA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MRS. MUDD'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OCEANSIDE, CA
Oceanside, CA
Oceanside, CA
Oceanside, CA
OCEANSIDE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KRISTIN YOUNG RAYDER
10299 SCRIPPS TRL STE 114SAN DIEGO, CA 92131-2366UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MUDD, BRIAN
- Other trademarks owned by MRS. MUDD'S, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MRS. MUDD'S, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MRS. MUDD'S, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MUDD, JAN
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named MRS. MUDD'S
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |