USPTO serial 76407393
TELCOPLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2987742Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 23, 2005
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TELCOPLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Getronics Intellectual Property B.V.
1043 AJ Amsterdam, NL
Other trademarks owned by Getronics Intellectual Property B.V.
Getronics Intellectual Property B.V.
1043 AJ Amsterdam, NL
Other trademarks owned by Getronics Intellectual Property B.V.
Getronics Intellectual Property B.V.
1043 AJ Amsterdam, NL
Other trademarks owned by Getronics Intellectual Property B.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith W. Medansky
KEITH W MEDANSKY PIPER RUDNICKP O BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Building construction and repair; maintenance and installation of computer systems and hardware in the field of data processing equipment and computers, information and communication technology (ICT) infrastructures, computer installations and installations for communication | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 2, 2001 |
| 042 | Product research and development, and technical consultation, all in the fields of the design, deployment, installation, management and maintenance of information and communication technology (ICT) infrastructures, computing systems, computer network installations, installations for communication, frameworks and modules therefor and software; maintenance and installation of computer software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 2, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Getronics Intellectual Property B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Getronics Intellectual Property B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Getronics Intellectual Property B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TELCOPLACE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |