USPTO serial 76409331
MDRIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MDRIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seattle, WA
Cingular Wireless II, Inc. LLC
Redmond, WA
REDMOND, WA
REDMOND, WA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely the wireless transmission, uploading and downloading of voice, data, images, audio, video signals, software, information, games, ring tones, and messages; providing wireless calling plans; wireless text and numeric digital messaging services; telecommunications gateway services; telecommunications consulting services; telemetry services; providing multiple user access to private networks; wireless and cellular voice, data and paging services; facsimile services; voice messaging services; call forwarding services; paging services; electronic mail services; wireless roaming services; ISP services, namely providing multiple user access to the Internet, wide area and local area networks; mobile commerce and e-commerce services, namely, telecommunication services that allow users to perform electronic business transactions via wireless telephones, personal digital assistants, handheld computers, and mobile data receivers and through a global computer information network, the Internet, wide area networks, local area networks and private computer information networks; cellular, wireless, digital, mobile and satellite telephone services; information transmission via personal communication services; telematic sending of information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alphie, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cingular Wireless II, Inc. LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named MDRIVE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 25, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |