Drawing for HARDWARE

USPTO serial 76411241

HARDWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARDWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anne B. Nielsen

DEANNE OZAKI UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP10 UNIVERSAL CITY PLZ STE 2330, 23RD FLUNIVERSAL CITY, CA 91608UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF AN ONGOING TELEVISION PROGRAM FEATURING CLIPS FROM MUSIC VIDEO AND VARIETY SHOWSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 1, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Dec 1, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Dec 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 13, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jun 1, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jun 1, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jun 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 1, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 4, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 13, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Oct 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 4, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 16, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 14, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 3, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 16, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance