USPTO serial 76413324
ACCUVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACCUVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Guildford GU1 2DW, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARSHA G. GENTNER
MARSHA G GENTNER JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | CONTACT LENS SOLUTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | SPECTACLES, SPECTACLE FRAMES, SPECTACLE LENSES, CONTACT LENSES, SUNGLASSES, SPECTACLE CASES, CONTACT LENS CASES AND CONTAINERS; PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | OPTICIAN AND OPHTHALMIC SERVICES INCLUDING SIGHT TESTING AND OPHTHALMIC SURGERY; MEDICAL AND SURGICAL SERVICES RELATING TO EYESIGHT AND VISUAL CORRECTION; LASER AND LASIK (LASER ASSISTED IN SITU KERATOMILEUSIS) EYE SURGERY SERVICES; CONSULTANCY SERVICES RELATING TO ALL THE AFORESAID SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |