Drawing for KIDZANIA

USPTO serial 76417109

KIDZANIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KIDZANIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B.G. Horowitz

ROBERT B G HOROWITZ COOPER & DUNHAM LLP1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal keychainsACTIVE—
016pens, pencils, stationery, notepads, paper napkins, notebook covers, writing papers; newsletters to the community about activities, jobs and special opportunities; wrapping paper, boxes and gift wrapping ribbons made from paper; corporate magazines for customers about productsACTIVE—
020non-metal keychains and plastic keychainsACTIVE—
021paper cups, paper plates, ceramic mugs and beverage glasswareACTIVE—
025hats, caps, visors, sweatshirts and jacketsACTIVE—
041entertainment services, namely, amusement arcades featuring interactive multiple player computer games; discotheques; theater services, namely, cinema theaters, dinner theaters, movie theaters, and production of plays; children's amusement centers; motion picture theater services; live performances by singers, musical bands, comedians, jugglers, magicians and actorsACTIVE—
042design and testing of new products for others, namely providing a test site for computer game software by featuring it in an amusement arcadeACTIVE—
043restaurant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 4, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 5, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 28, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 8, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance