USPTO serial 76421329
SONICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3006183Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 11, 2005
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SONICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Milpitas, CA
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
Mountain View, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Lee Taylor
Jennifer Lee Taylor MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STREETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used as a development tool for use in the design of integrated circuits; micronetworks for use in the design of integrated circuits; system-level protocol cores and device drivers for use in consumer electronics, communications and computers; software application design tools for use in design of integrated circuits | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2005 |
| 042 | Technical consulting and technical support services in the field of integrated circuit design | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2011 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 2, 2011 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |