Drawing for QUICKCONNECT

USPTO serial 76422634

QUICKCONNECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUICKCONNECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ON SCREEN TELEVISION INPUT/OUTPUT DEVICE THAT ALLOWS THE USER TO ACCESS THE FIRST TIME SET-UP OPTIONSACTIVEJun 14, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Feb 22, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 21, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 21, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 5, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Aug 19, 2010RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Aug 19, 2010CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN
Aug 19, 2010ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 12, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 9, 2010RGTRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB REQUEST
Jul 9, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 8, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 28, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 17, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 14, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 14, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Apr 8, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 8, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 6, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 1, 2010APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Mar 30, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Mar 29, 2010PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
May 23, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
May 23, 2008CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN
May 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 15, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
May 15, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 15, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 15, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jan 29, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 29, 2008CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jan 4, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jan 4, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 17, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jun 20, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jun 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 12, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jan 12, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 12, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 12, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 3, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 13, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 13, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 13, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 13, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 13, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jan 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 14, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance