Drawing for AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ESTHETICIANS

USPTO serial 76423618

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ESTHETICIANS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ESTHETICIANS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL A. PAINTER, ESQ.

MICHAEL A PAINTER ESQ ISAACMAN KAUFMAN & PAINTER PC8484 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 850BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035association services, namely, promotion, fostering and developing the science and art of estheticians and establishing an academy of members in the fieldACTIVE
041educational services; namely, conducting symposiums and conferences, and the training of professionals in the esthetician fieldACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 2, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 30, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jan 20, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 7, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 23, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 5, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance