USPTO serial 76429040
HOT ROD FACTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOT ROD FACTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Miami Beach, FL
Miami Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander E. Barthet
ALEXANDER E BARTHET PATRICK C BARTHET PA200 S BISCAYNE BLVD STE 1800MIAMI, FL 33131-2329UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Glassware and related accessories, namely beverage glassware, drinking steins, mugs, cups, sports bottles sold empty, plastic coasters, and thermal insulated containers for beverage | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Vehicle rental services | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services, take-out restaurant services, and bar services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cohen, Leon
- Other trademarks owned by Cohen, Leon
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named HOT ROD FACTORY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2005 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CWBI | WITHDRAWN BEFORE REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |