USPTO serial 76429247
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
PVH Superba/Insignia Neckwear, Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by PVH Superba/Insignia Neckwear, Inc.
Arlington, TX
Arlington, TX
Arlington, TX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James J. Murphy,
Diane K. Lettelleir Tandy Brands Accessories, Inc.690 E. Lamar, Ste. 200Attn: Martie RockeyArlington, TX 76011| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ PAGER CARRYING CASES MADE OF LEATHER ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | [ POCKET ACCESSORIES HOLDERS MADE OF LEATHER] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | [ LEATHER GOODS, NAMELY, WALLETS; KEY HOLDERS; POCKET-SIZE LEATHER CASES FOR SUCH ITEMS AS MONEY, RECEIPTS, PAPER, CARDS, TISSUES, KEYS, NAIL CLIPPERS, PENS, PENCILS,; AND CARD HOLDERS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | [ NON-METAL MONEY CLIPS MADE OF LEATHER ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | BELTS FOR CLOTHING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |