USPTO serial 76430661
SAFE TOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAFE TOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Markham, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. Parr
RICHARD J PARR BERESKIN & PARR40 KING ST W40TH FL SCOTIA PLZTORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |