USPTO serial 76434340
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Port Angeles, WA
Port Angeles, WA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin Costanza
KEVIN S COSTANZA SEED IP LAW GROUP PLLC701 FIFTH AVE STE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal rails, tracks and guideways for vehicles, namely, magnetic vehicles, magnetically floating vehicles and magnetically launched vehicles; and replacement parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | vehicles, namely, trains, railway cars, railway coaches, and monorail trains; magnetic vehicles, namely, trains, railway cars, railway coaches, all for magnetic levitation train systems; magnetic levitation system vehicles, namely, trains, railway cars and railway coaches; magnetically elevated vehicles, namely, magnetically levitating trains, railway cars and railway coaches; magnetically launched vehicles, namely, rockets, spacecraft and ships; and structural parts for all the above | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | installation of transport systems, namely, magnetic vehicles, magnetically launched vehicles and magnetically elevated vehicle systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | providing transport by vehicle transport systems, namely, magnetic vehicles, magnetically launched vehicles and magnetically supported vehicle systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | research and development for others in the field of magnetic travel; design and planning for others in the field of vehicle transport systems, namely, magnetic vehicles, magnetically launched vehicles and magnetically elevated vehicle systems | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 22, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |