Drawing for LEVX

USPTO serial 76434340

LEVX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEVX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin Costanza

KEVIN S COSTANZA SEED IP LAW GROUP PLLC701 FIFTH AVE STE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal rails, tracks and guideways for vehicles, namely, magnetic vehicles, magnetically floating vehicles and magnetically launched vehicles; and replacement parts thereforACTIVE
012vehicles, namely, trains, railway cars, railway coaches, and monorail trains; magnetic vehicles, namely, trains, railway cars, railway coaches, all for magnetic levitation train systems; magnetic levitation system vehicles, namely, trains, railway cars and railway coaches; magnetically elevated vehicles, namely, magnetically levitating trains, railway cars and railway coaches; magnetically launched vehicles, namely, rockets, spacecraft and ships; and structural parts for all the aboveACTIVE
037installation of transport systems, namely, magnetic vehicles, magnetically launched vehicles and magnetically elevated vehicle systemsACTIVE
039providing transport by vehicle transport systems, namely, magnetic vehicles, magnetically launched vehicles and magnetically supported vehicle systemsACTIVE
042research and development for others in the field of magnetic travel; design and planning for others in the field of vehicle transport systems, namely, magnetic vehicles, magnetically launched vehicles and magnetically elevated vehicle systemsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 12, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
May 30, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
May 30, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 1, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Dec 1, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Dec 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 1, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 1, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 22, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 16, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 16, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 6, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 1, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 1, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 2, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 9, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 10, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 7, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance