Drawing for LIP CONCENTRATE

USPTO serial 76438105

LIP CONCENTRATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIP CONCENTRATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

MYRON AMER MYRON AMER, PC114 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 310MINEOLA, NY 11501UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003LIP COLOR, LIP GLOSS, LIP PENCILS, LIPLINER PENCILSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 30, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 30, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 14, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jul 12, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jul 11, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
May 19, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 19, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 10, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jan 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 4, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 6, 2004REINREINSTATED
May 27, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
May 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 12, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Feb 5, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance