USPTO serial 76438874
DATA OBJECT ORIENTED REPOSITORY SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DATA OBJECT ORIENTED REPOSITORY SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rowland Heights, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danton K. Mak
DANTON K MAK SHELDON & MAK225 S LAKE AVE STE 900PASADENA, CA 91101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs, for use as a spreadsheet; for use as a calculator; for word processing; for data entry, access, query, analysis, comparison, reporting, and management; for data communications, for electronic mail, for online chat, for electronic messaging; for image editing, for graphics creation, editing and graphics album management; for audio and video recording and editing, and the storage and management of audio and video tracks; for multimedia presentations, for multimedia presentations using multiple types of data objects, for shared editing of text and multimedia documents over private and public networks; for text and multimedia document authoring, storage, retrieval, contention control, version history tracking, profiling, access control, and security; for use as an electronic filing cabinet of multimedia data in a wide variety of data formats; for producing charts and graphs and other graphical representation of information; for printing; for use as a personal information manager; for data encryption, security, and data access control; for financial management and planning, for user training, for investment analysis, for human resource management, and for project management; Integrated computer software consisting of one or more of the functions stated above; Suite of computer software consisting of one or more of the above programs; A complete line of computer software consisting of one or more of the above programs; Utility programs for all of the above; and printed manuals and electronic media for storing the software distributed as a unit with all of the above | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |