USPTO serial 76440291
MY BROADBAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MY BROADBAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad D. Rose, Esq.
Brad D. Rose Pryor Cashman LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail and wholesale stores featuring recorded items, musical products, movie, television and radio-related products, printed publications, clothing and related accessories, bags and related accessories, jewelry and related accessories, cosmetics, fragrances, hair, skin and nail products, toiletry products, eyewear and computer goods; on-line retail store services featuring recorded items, musical products, movie, television and radio-related products, printed publications, clothing and related accessories, bags and related accessories, jewelry and related accessories, cosmetics, fragrances, hair, skin and nail products, toiletry products, eyewear and computer goods; on-line ordering services featuring recorded items, musical products, movie, television and radio-related products, printed publications, clothing and related accessories, bags and related accessories, jewelry and related accessories, cosmetics, fragrances, hair, skin and nail products, toiletry products, eyewear and computer goods; electronic retailing services via computer featuring recorded items, musical products, movie, television and radio-related products, printed publications, clothing and related accessories, bags and related accessories, jewelry and related accessories, cosmetics, fragrances, hair, skin and nail products, toiletry products, eyewear and computer goods; retail store services, available through computer communications and interactive television, featuring recorded items, musical products, movie, television and radio-related products, printed publications, clothing and related accessories, bags and related accessories, jewelry and related accessories, cosmetics, fragrances, hair, skin and nail products, toiletry products, eyewear and computer goods; providing an on-line computer database in the field of recorded items, musical products, movie, television and radio-related products, printed publications, clothing and related accessories, bags and related accessories, jewelry and related accessories, cosmetics, fragrances, hair, skin and nail products, toiletry products, eyewear and computer goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |