Drawing for MY BROADBAND

USPTO serial 76440292

MY BROADBAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CARTY, GEORGIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MY BROADBAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brad D. Rose, Esq.

BRAD D ROSE ESQ PRYOR CASHMAN SHERMAN & FLYNN410 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Radio broadcasting; radio communication; cable radio broadcasting; cable radio transmission; mobile radio communication services; audio broadcasting; broadcasting programs via a global computer network; Television broadcasting; subscription television broadcasting; television transmission services; cable television broadcasting; cable television transmission services; pay-per-view television transmission services; video broadcastingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 8, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 30, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 21, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 23, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 19, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 10, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 18, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 14, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 13, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance