Drawing for PARSYS

USPTO serial 76442480

PARSYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARSYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric P. Mirabel

ERIC P MIRABEL BIOARRAY SOLUTIONS35 TECHNOLOGY DRNEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Single or multiple randomly assembled bead arrays for use in medical research and scientific applications; kits for arrays and assemblies comprising nucleotide probes attached to beads for use in medical research and scientific applicationsACTIVE
005Single or multiple randomly assembled bead arrays for use in diagnostic applications; kits for arrays and assemblies comprising nucleotide probes attached to beads for use in diagnostic applicationsACTIVE
037Medical research services, namely, installing, servicing and maintaining arrays and assemblies for use in medical research, scientific research and diagnostic research applications; medical research services, namely, installing, servicing and maintaining kits for arrays and assemblies for use in medical research, scientific research and diagnostic research applicationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Oct 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 3, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Dec 21, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 28, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 12, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 3, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 26, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 24, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 20, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jun 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 17, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 6, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 17, 2004ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jan 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Dec 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 23, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 30, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Apr 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance