USPTO serial 76444287
SIZZLIN SAUCES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIZZLIN SAUCES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Weston, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Herbert
PAUL HERBERT RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERT LLPSTE 1800 2 BLOOR ST ETORONTO, ON M4W 3J5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | food and food products, namely, dry and/or wet dressings and sauces, namely, salad dressings, dressings for salads; marinades; dipping sauce; dressings for fruit; pizza sauces; barbecue sauces; pasta sauces; vegetable sauces; fish sauces; seafood sauces; poultry sauces; dessert sauces; mayonnaise; whipped salad dressings; vinaigrettes; salsa; chutney; cheese based sauces; mustard; dry seasoning; wet spice rubs; spice mixes; meat sauces, chocolate toppings, bruschetta, and yellow mustard | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |