Drawing for FLYING DRAGON

USPTO serial 76445495

FLYING DRAGON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLYING DRAGON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EVAN A. RAYNES

EVAN A RAYNES FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015Musical instruments, namely, drums and percussion instruments, foot pedals for drums and percussion instrumentsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 3, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 1, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 28, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jun 7, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
May 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 17, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 10, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Mar 4, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 4, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 19, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Feb 11, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 11, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 11, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance