USPTO serial 76445495
FLYING DRAGON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLYING DRAGON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EVAN A. RAYNES
EVAN A RAYNES FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | Musical instruments, namely, drums and percussion instruments, foot pedals for drums and percussion instruments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 1, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |