Drawing for SUNVIM

USPTO serial 76445578

SUNVIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNVIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Lee

DAVID W LEE108 N YNEZ AVESTE 128MONTEREY PARK, CA 91754

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Solid and embroidery towels; jacquard and velour towels; jacquard and sold towels; bath towels; beach towels; hand towels; sauna towels; printed handkerchief; dish cloths; tracing cloth use for embroidery purposed; cloth coaster; bed sheets; bed covers; duvet covers; mattress covers; comforters; bed linen; linen fabric; table covers; quilts; blankets; pillowcases; under quilts; simple layer quilts; over quilts; quilt covers; bed blankets; bed spreads; cover for cushions; quilts for little children; labels of textiles; druggets; curtains of textiles; table linen shower curtains; draperies; flannel; bath linens; fabrics for making awnings, outdoor use patio furniture, outdoor umbrellas, boat covers, tents, canopies, or sun screens; bath towel set comprised of face towels, hand towels, bath towels, and floor towels; unfitted fabric furniture covers; unfitted furniture covers; bed spreads; textile wall hanging, namely tapestries; felt cloth; towels for washing dirt made of cotton, vinyl, linen, polyester, nylon or combination thereof; textile fabric made of cotton, linen, polyester, nylon or combination thereof; decorative fabric for use in manufacturing furniture; and wipe towels for glasses made of synthetic cow hidesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 8, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 30, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 15, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 12, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Nov 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Oct 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 25, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance