USPTO serial 76447270
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Atlanta, GA
Other trademarks owned by United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Atlanta, GA
Other trademarks owned by United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Atlanta, GA
Other trademarks owned by United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith E. Sharkin, Esq.
KEITH E SHARKIN ESQ KING & SPALDING1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in the transportation and delivery field, namely for provision of current shipping status, package details, shipping service options and costs, package arrival dates and delivery notification; for providing automated download of files relating to tracking information on shipped packages, including current shipping status, package details, package arrival dates and delivery notification; for validation of Street addresses; preparing and printing of shipping labels, documents and invoices; for providing electronic shipping labels, shipping documents and invoices; for providing information on available transportation and delivery services; for providing proof of delivery documentation including digitized signature of the recipient of the package; and for the receipt, transmission and processing of customer identifying shipping account information | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1996 |
| 035 | Providing package tracking services concerning information on pickup, delivery and return of packages and personal property by air, rail, boat and motor vehicles over the global computer network; providing automated registration for customers identifying shipping account information over the global computer network; licensing of computer software; arranging expedited pick-up, storage, transportation and delivery of documents, packages and personal property by air, rail, boat and motor vehicle; package tracking using a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1996 |
| 038 | Online document delivery via a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1996 |
| 039 | Providing information on international transportation and delivery services; transportation, delivery and return of packages and personal property by air, rail, boat, and motor vehicle | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |