Drawing for IDENTITY SAVER

USPTO serial 76455487

IDENTITY SAVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LORENZO, ROBERT
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IDENTITY SAVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Randel S. Springer

RANDEL S SPRINGER WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE PLLCONE W 4TH STWINSTON SALEM, NC 27101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Credit, debit and ATM card registration services, credit, debit and ATM card cancellation services for lost or stolen cards; reporting lost or stolen credit, debit and ATM cards to card issuer; ordering replacement cards for others; notification to the issuer of credit, debit and ATM cards of changes in address; monitoring consumer credit files and providing an alert to any changes therein; promoting public awareness of the need for consumers to protect themselves from consumer fraud and identity theft by providing consumer information in the field of credit protection and identity theft by means of telephone or global computer networksACTIVE
036Financial services, namely, identity theft expense reimbursement services; providing financial information, namely, providing credit reports; credit file monitoring; financial consultation services, namely, assisting customers in notifying and filing complaints regarding lost or stolen credit cards or other forms of identity theft; providing information in the field of credit protection and identity theft by means of telephone or global computer networksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 3, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 11, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 22, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 11, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 9, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 14, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance