USPTO serial 76457502
AFRICALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AFRICALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Siegmar Silber
SIEGMAR SILBER SILBER & FRIDMAN1037 ROUTE 46 E STE 207CLIFTON, NJ 07013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Long distance telephone calling cards not magnetically encoded and prepaid telephone call cards not magnetically encoded | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Services in connection with telecommunications services, namely, domestic and international long distance telephone communications services; and, telephone and telecommunications network services, namely, electronic transmission of voice, data and information messages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |