USPTO serial 76457621
BAD BOY BILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BAD BOY BILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph J. Madonia, Esq.
JOSEPH J MADONIA ESQ JOSEPH J MADONIA & ASSOCIATES39 S LASALLE ST STE 925CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Commercial recordings, namely, sound recordings featuring music and musical performances, musical sound recordings, pre-recorded compact discs, phonograph records and audio tape cassettes featuring music; video recordings, pre-recorded videotape cassettes and digital video discs featuring musical performances and musical entertainment | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1983 |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, live performances, live music, and performance tours; music production services; visual and audio performance services in the nature of live concerts and musical performances; entertainment and recording services in the nature of disc-jockey services for events and recording studios; and audio recording and production for others | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 4, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 4, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |