USPTO serial 76460004
RCD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RCD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-38436 Wolfsburg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barth X. deRosa
BARTH X DEROSA STEVENS, DAVIS, MILLER & MOSHER, LLP1615 L ST NW STE 850WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric theft prevention apparatus, namely, alarms, namely, burglar alarms, fire alarms, anti-theft alarms for vehicles, remote control apparatus, namely, automatic control mechanisms for the steering and control of vehicles and engines, simulators for the steering and control of vehicles, in the nature of, airplane flight simulators; automobile driving simulators, remote controls used for, the remote operation of a motor vehicle; electric navigational instruments, namely, electronic satellite navigational systems, namely, a global positioning system [GPS], compasses, namely directional compasses, navigational instruments, namely, sextants, compasses, navigational buoys, marker buoys, safety markers, apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, namely, antennas, radios, satellite radios, CD players, digital audio players, digital audiotape players, MP3 players, portable media players, television apparatus, namely, television sets, television antennas, DVD players, telephone apparatus, namely video telephones, magnetic, electronic and optical data carriers, namely, blank magnetic data carriers, recording discs, namely, magnetic coded cards, blank smart cards, magnetic encoded integrated circuit cards containing programming, namely, magnetic coded cards for use in the field of building security systems, and magnetically encoded pre-paid telephone calling cards; calculators; data processing apparatus, namely, computers, computer programs, for use in data base management, and as a spread sheet, computers, electronic calendars and organizers, namely, handheld personal electronic devices for scheduling appointments, facsimile machines, monitors, namely, computer monitors, video monitors, computer peripherals, pocket calculators; fire extinguishers, recorded computer programs and software and data collections excluding computer software for use in the development of catalogs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |