USPTO serial 76460453
BLUE MOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLUE MOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marc E. Miller, Amy Jones, Chester Jordan
MARC E MILLER MCLEOD, WATKINSON & MILLERONE MASSACHUSETTS AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |