Drawing for ARÔME

USPTO serial 76460771

ARÔME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARÔME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

P. Weston Musselman, Jr.

P WESTON MUSSELMAN JR JENKENS & GILCHRIST, PC1445 ROSS AVE STE 3200DALLAS, TX 75202-2799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033brandyACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Apr 20, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Apr 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Oct 28, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 22, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 22, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 18, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Feb 19, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 2, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 28, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 5, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 16, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 11, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 10, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance