Drawing for REACTION DESIGN

USPTO serial 76460914

REACTION DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REACTION DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Whittaker

STACY L TAYLOR FOLEY & LARDNER LLPPO BOX 80278SAN DIEGO, CA 92138UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely programs delivered on media such as CD-ROMs and via electronic communications networks for chemical reaction simulations, chemical kinetics simulations, and chemical flow simulations; and user manuals and instructions sold as a unit with the aboveACTIVEJan 1, 1997
041training in the use and operation of software for chemical reaction simulations, chemical kinetics simulations, and chemical flow simulationsACTIVEJan 1, 1996
042consultation in the field of modeling chemical reactions, chemical kinetics, and chemical flows; consultation in the field of incorporating software for chemical reaction simulations, chemical kinetics simulations, and chemical flow simulations into other software environmentsACTIVEJan 1, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 23, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 13, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 11, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 16, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 16, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Dec 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 27, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Oct 26, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Sep 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 27, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 30, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Jun 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 10, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 2, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED
Jun 2, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED
Jun 2, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED
May 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 28, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Oct 1, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED
Oct 1, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance