USPTO serial 76462243
BLACK TI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLACK TI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Deerfield Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MELVIN K. SILVERMAN
MELVIN K SILVERMAN ESQ MELVIN K. SILVERMAN AND ASSOCS, PC500 W CYPRESS CRK RD STE 500FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry, including rings, bracelets, pendants and earrings | ACTIVE | Jul 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 10, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 10, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |