Drawing for TRANSACTION STREAMS PROCESSING

USPTO serial 76462643

TRANSACTION STREAMS PROCESSING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRANSACTION STREAMS PROCESSING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Valerie du Laney

VALERIE DU LANEY MILLER NASH LLP4400 TWO UN SQ601 UN STSEATTLE, WA 98101-2352

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable high-tech software for the secure transmission of data, namely, for electronic filing of confidential information and government documents including tax forms for government and private businesses over the world-wide webACTIVENov 3, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Feb 18, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Nov 2, 2004LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED
Nov 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2004IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Jan 7, 2004AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Dec 2, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Dec 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 2, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance