USPTO serial 76468291
WHY MEN CHEAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHY MEN CHEAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Cox
WILLIAM H COX JANVEY GORDON HERLANDS RANDOLPH355 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-6603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded audio and video tapes, motion picture films, phonographic records, compact discs, laser discs and DVD discs all featuring live-action films, comedy films, drama films and/or animated films and/or music; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, namely tape recorders and tape players, compact disc players, MP3 players, phonograph players, radios, DVD players and VHS players and recorders; interactive entertainment software; interactive video game programs; interactive multimedia computer game programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of a television comedy series | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Strato Trading Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Strato Trading Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WHY MEN CHEAT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |