USPTO serial 76471113
DIOSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIOSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Po Kong, Kowloon, HK
San Po Kong, Kowloon, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Afschineh Latifi
AFSCHINEH LATIFI TUCKER & LATIFI LLP160 E 84TH ST STE 5-ENEW YORK, NY 10028UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing; namely, tee shirts, shirts, sweaters, skirts, Jackets, pants, jeans, dresses, hats, tracksuits, ties, coats, suits and footwear | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 10, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |