USPTO serial 76473953
MERYL NATEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MERYL NATEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
62051 SAINT LAURENT BLANGY, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas A. Kain, Esq.
THOMAS A KAIN ESQ COLUCCI & UMANS101 E 52ND STNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | RAW TEXTILE FIBERS, POLYAMIDE TEXTILE FIBRES; SYNTHETIC FIBRES; ARTIFICIAL TEXTILE FIBRES | ACTIVE | — |
| 023 | YARNS USED IN TEXTILES; POLYAMIDE SYNTHETIC TEXTILE YARN | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | FABRICS FOR THE FURTHER MANUFACTURE OF CLOTHING, LUGGAGE, LINGERIE, SHOES AD HATS; BEDSPREADS AND TABLE CLOTHS NOT MADE PAPER, NET CURTAINS; CURTAINS; UPHOLSTERY FABRICS; FABRICS MADE FROM POLYAMIDE, SYNTHETIC FIBRES OR YARNS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHOES, HEADWEAR; SOCKS; ANKLE SOCKS; STOCKINGS, KNEE HIGHS, TIGHTS, LINGERIE | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | CLOTH WALL COVERINGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2004 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |