USPTO serial 76476829
CABCALLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CABCALLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN R. GARBER
JOHN R GARBER60 WOODCREST LNDANBURY, CT 06810UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMBINATION SIGNAL WHISTLE AND BLINKING FLASHLIGHT FOR HAILING TAXICABS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |