Drawing for POWER CITY

USPTO serial 76479225

POWER CITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWER CITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GEORGE W. LEWIS

GEORGE W LEWIS JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC.THE JENIFER BLDG400 SEVENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Air compressors featuring air inflators and deflators for tires; portable electric battery powered generators; electric car polishers and electric sandersACTIVE
011Hand held rechargeable spotlights; thermoelectric portable coolers and refrigerators and rechargeable table and hanging lampsACTIVE
035On-line retail store services featuring automotive, marine, rv and camping aftermarket productsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Oct 5, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 5, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 5, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 15, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 5, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 11, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 5, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 5, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 13, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 23, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 28, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 22, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 25, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance