Drawing for MASTERFOODS

USPTO serial 76481068

MASTERFOODS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASTERFOODS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cristina A. Carvalho

CRISTINA A CARVALHO ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029potato-based side dishes, vegetable dips, and bean dipsACTIVE
030ketchup, horseradish cream, salsa, rice, rice mixes, and pasta mixesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 11, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
May 24, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
May 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 7, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Nov 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 23, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
May 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 25, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
May 25, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 9, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 24, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 3, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 24, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 27, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 12, 2003CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance