USPTO serial 76483196
MIX MASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIX MASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | HUMAN WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEM FOR PERSONAL USE AND COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF DISPOSABLE PLASTIC SANITATION BAGS, GELLING POWDER, TOILET PAPER AND A NON-MEDICATED HAND CLEANING PREPARATION | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |