USPTO serial 76485618
MIRATONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIRATONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kaushal R Odedra,
KAUSHAL R ODEDRA WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK, LLP2033 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes; aromatics, namely, aromatherapy creams, aromatherapy oils, aromatherapy water; room fragrances, scented room sprays; eau de cologne, essential oils for personal use; deodorants, namely, personal deodorants; hair remover namely, hair removing preparations, hair removing cream; pomade, namely, pomade for cosmetic purposes, pomade cream, hair pomade; hair lotion, hair conditioner, hair setting foam and gel, hair color preparations, hair bleaches, face wash foam, skin lotion, skin milk, skin cream, cosmetics, lipstick and lip color preparations, anti-perspirant, shampoo, namely hair shampoo, body shampoo; soaps, namely skin soaps, facial soaps, hand soaps, body soaps; dentifrices; non-medicated bath preparations, namely bath liquid soaps, bath gel, bath powder; bath salt and bath tablet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CPEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |