Drawing for PROTEX COTE

USPTO serial 76485706

PROTEX COTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROTEX COTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah A. Basile

DEBORAH A BASILE DOHERTY, WALLACE, PILLSBURY AND MURPHYONE MONARCH PLSPRINGFIELD, MA 01144UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001liquid chemical composites namely, agents used to seal, harden and waterproofABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2004ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Feb 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 22, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 26, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 25, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 20, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 8, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance