Drawing for READYWIRE

USPTO serial 76486735

READYWIRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with READYWIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lloyd W. Sadler

LLOYD W SADLER SNELL & WILMER LLP15 W SOUTH TEMPLE STE 1200GATEWAY TWR WSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic communications devices, namely networking units for enabling communication between electronic devices, also known as modems, telephones, facsimile machines, computers, televisions, video cassette players, digital video players, telephone message machines, network hubs, switchboards; audio distribution hardware, also known as radios, compact disc players, speakers, audio tape players; video distribution hardware, also known as digital video cameras, analog video cameras, modems, digital video players, video cassette players, video recorders, modems, computers; broadband service hardware, also known as cable modems, wireless modems, wireless hubs, network hubs, ethernet hubs, computers; communications control units, also known as telephones, computers, switchboards, set-top boxes; home automation control units and hardware, also known as computers, remote controllers, alarm system controllers, lighting control switches, temperature thermostats and controllers; each of which is used for enabling transmission of audio, video and/or data over radio frequency and/or A/C powerline channelsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Nov 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 17, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 17, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 17, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 13, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 5, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 23, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance