Drawing for SLENDERPLUG

USPTO serial 76495700

SLENDERPLUG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SLENDERPLUG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PAUL J. SUTTON

PAUL J SUTTON GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRICAL EXTENSION CORDSACTIVEAug 16, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Nov 7, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Nov 6, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
May 11, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 10, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 10, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 24, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 21, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 12, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 7, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 7, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 18, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 17, 2004ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 8, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance