USPTO serial 76498026
CONSOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONSOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl M. Zielaznicki
KARL M ZIELAZNICKI JENKENS & GILCHRIST PARKER CHAPIN LLPTHE CHRYSLER BLDG405 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10174Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | application service provider featuring e-sourcing, procurement and spend management system software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |