USPTO serial 76498182
DURALENE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DURALENE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE A. BREINER
THEODORE A BREINER BREINER & BREINER, L.L.C.POST OFFICE BOX 19290ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320-0290UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | fertilizers for professional, commercial, agricultural and domestic use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AGRIUM POLYMER COATINGS CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by Pursell Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pursell Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named DURALENE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |