USPTO serial 76498870
DRUNKNMUNKY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRUNKNMUNKY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lake Success, NY
Lake Success, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Softballs, baseballs, basketballs, soccer balls, lacrosse balls, footballs, rugby balls; hockey pucks; weights for exercise and for lifting; weight lifting belts; protective gear for sports and athletic use, namely chest protectors, shin guards, helmets, elbow pads; athletic supporters; golf bags, golf clubs, golf club heads, hand grips for golf clubs, head covers for golf clubs, golf bag tags, tees, and ball markers; lacrosse ball bags; baseball and softball bases; baseball, softball, and cricket bats; mitts and gloves for softball, baseball, and hockey; grip tape for bats and clubs; skis, ski bindings, and parts therefor; catcher's masks for baseball and softball; face masks for hockey; volleyball game playing equipment; field hockey sticks, ice hockey sticks; lacrosse sticks; ice skates; inline skates and roller skates; snowboards; snowboard accessories, namely, bindings; skateboards; skateboard accessories, namely, wheels; surfboards; surfboard accessories, namely, leashes and fins; dolls; action figures; toy vehicles; and board games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |