USPTO serial 76498918
PROFIT-TOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROFIT-TOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seebruck/Chiemsee, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Abrading tools, Hand tools, namely drills, hammers, manually-operated grinding wheels, manually-operated grindstones, mitre boxes, manually operated sharpening wheels, pincers, saws, squares, taps, tongs, flippers, caulk line reels, putty knives, engravers, paint scrapers, Hand-held tools, namely, machine tools for the cutting and forming of materials, Multi-function hand tools comprised of power lawn and garden, namely chippers Power operated lawn and garden tools, namely, cultivators Power operated tools, namely, drill hammers Power tools, namely thread mills, Power operated tools, namely, grinders Roll-up fabric container for hand tools | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2003 |
| 008 | Abrading tools, Hand tools, namely drills, hammers, manually-operated grinding wheels, manually-operated grindstones, mitre boxes, manually operated sharpening wheels, pincers, saws, squares, taps, tongs, nippers, caulk line reels, putty knives, engravers, paint scrapers, Hand-held tools, namely, machine tools for the cutting and forming of materials, Multi-function hand tools comprised of power lawn and garden, namely chippers Power operated lawn and garden tools, namely, cultivators Power operated tools, namely, drill hammers Power tools, namely thread mills, Power operated tools, namely, grinders Roll-up fabric container for hand tools | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2005 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2005 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2004 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |